Jump to content

Talk:George Washington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleGeorge Washington is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 2, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
June 21, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 28, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
December 10, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
February 3, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 19, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
July 2, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
September 13, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
June 6, 2011Good article nomineeListed
January 26, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
June 24, 2018Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 11, 2018Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 31, 2023Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 1, 2023Peer reviewReviewed
February 1, 2025Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 30, 2004, April 30, 2005, April 30, 2006, April 30, 2008, April 30, 2009, April 30, 2010, April 30, 2015, and April 30, 2022.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of August 27, 2006.
Current status: Featured article

George Washinton's Birth Year (O.S. vs. N.S.)

[edit]

When the calendar's were changed it was by 11 days not 376 days. It states that he was born in 1731 Old Style and 1732 New Style. There seems to be no debate that he was born on February 22 1732 New Style which means he was born on February 11 1732 Old Style, not 1731. 174.210.160.209 (talk) 03:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the footnote directly after the date. Remsense ‥  04:20, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And also consider reading the recurring themes linkage stated above in the talk page headers:
How to render Washington's birth year has been previously discussed on this talk page, as seen in the Talk page Archives including Talk:George Washington/Archive 1#Birth date, Talk:George Washington/Archive 6#George Washington's birthday, Talk:George Washington/Archive 6#Founding Fathers' birthdates, Talk:George Washington/Archive 9#GW's birthday & calendar switch issue, Talk:George Washington/Archive 7#Birthdate, and Talk:George Washington/Archive 10#Dates for George Washington's birth. Editorial consensus is that he was born in "1731/Old Style" and in "1732/New Style" - this rendering is supported by reliable sources.
- Shearonink (talk) 04:24, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
According to an Old Style to New Style Converter, 02/11/1731 O.S. is equivalent to 22/02/1732 N.S. Your proposed 02/11/1732 converts to 22/02/1733. Is the converter wrong? Or do I misunderstand the topic at hand? 1101 (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Talib1101 I don't know if you noticed but it looks like the camptonfamily converter is right but also sort of wrong. It apparently switches from mm/dd/yyyy to dd/mm/yyyy. However, the OP's proposed date of 02/11/1732 Old Style? That is completely wrong. - Shearonink (talk) 01:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again, read the footnote directly following the date. Remsense ‥  06:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK. For anyone coming upon this discussion, about the calendar change in dates & years - yes it is confusing - it's because 2 things happened:1)the date that the year started was actually changed from March 25th to January 1st and 2)the calendar was changed in Great Britain - England, Wales, Ireland, and the American colonies from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar.

The first paragraph in Wikipedia article Old Style and New Style dates explains the double change - of both certain dates and of years:
SO...the way that years were enumerated changed. Suddenly, the year didn't start on March 25th anymore, it now started on January 1st. Anyone born between January 1st and March 25th suddenly seemed to get a later year, and in our subject's case, 1731 became 1732.
AND, dates were shifted forward 11 days. February 11th Old Style became February 22nd New Style.
And yes, please read the footnote directly following the date. Also. Refer to Old Style and New Style dates, especially the section Britain and its colonies or possessions. Thank you. - Shearonink (talk) 01:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
PS - And now, I suppose, we can perhaps at some point add this section to "Recurring themes" above... - Shearonink (talk) 01:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

George Washington was a genocide perpetrator

[edit]

George Washington was a perpetrator of Native American genocide. Among the Iroquois, his genocidal brutality earned him the nickname Town Destroyer. I previously added the category Category:Native American genocide perpetrators to the article. It was removed by User:Drdpw who deemed it "Not suitable". The category is quite suitable and factual. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 22:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the genocide minimization department, I would like to add that this article makes no mention of genocide. The article does say that "Washington, meanwhile, ordered an expedition against the Iroquois, the Indigenous allies of the British, destroying their villages", however, there is no mention of the "Town Destroyer" nickname nor a link to it. That should change. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 22:15, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The link and a different translation, "devourer of villages", appears in the Colonial military career section. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:20, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pointing that out. I don't see any discussion of genocide though. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 22:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would also advocate for John Washington being classified as a Native American genocide perpetrator. He was also called "Town Destroyer", which his article mentions. Although again, the term "genocide" is never used. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 22:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The relevant guidance from WP:FRINGE: For writers and editors of Wikipedia articles to write about controversial ideas in a neutral manner, it is of vital importance that they simply restate what is said by independent secondary sources of reasonable reliability and quality. Do you have some sources of "reasonable reliability and quality" that you have in mind? It would be especially interesting to check what the "serious" biographers such as Flexner, Chernow, etc. have to say about this. Of course if those heavyweights don't like "genocide", we aren't going to get away with it. Bruce leverett (talk) 01:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The main narrative appears to be something like: "In 1675 (by which time John Washington's rank had increased to colonel), he and fellow Virginia planter and militia officer Isaac Allerton and Maryland Major Trueman led retaliation against Maryland natives who had killed three Virginia colonists after a trade dispute. During a planned parley with the disgruntled opposition and their allied American Indian leaders, Maryland militia killed at least five surrendered or parleying Doeg and Susquehannock warriors." ErnestKrause (talk) 01:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]